Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4591 - 4600 of 58483 for speedy trial.

State v. Fontaine L. Baker
assistance by not arguing that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to: (1) argue that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19095 - 2005-07-25

[PDF] State v. Fontaine L. Baker
by not arguing that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to: (1) argue that the State violated Baker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19095 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Armando T. Trevino, Jr.
in a colloquy with the trial court that the complaint would be the factual basis for his plea. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11819 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Thomas Wenk
. Thomas Wenk appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition seeking a conditional release from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3369 - 2017-09-19

City of West Allis v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
an undivided $100,000,000 in punitive damages. WEPCO also appeals the trial court’s order imposing sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2602 - 2005-03-31

City of West Allis v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
an undivided $100,000,000 in punitive damages. WEPCO also appeals the trial court’s order imposing sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16192 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard N. Konkol
. ¶1 BROWN, J. In this OWI case, the State anticipated before trial what the theory of the defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4273 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Cornelius Reed
intentional homicide, party to a crime, and from the trial court's order denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9497 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Richard N. Konkol
. ¶1 BROWN, J. In this OWI case, the State anticipated before trial what the theory of the defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4272 - 2017-09-19

Grain Dryer Systems v. Kevin Adams
award to Adams, (2) the jury verdict was perverse, (3) the trial court erred in excluding opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15935 - 2005-03-31