Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45901 - 45910 of 56213 for n y c.
Search results 45901 - 45910 of 56213 for n y c.
State v. Kenneth R. Metz
that this restitution order was authorized by Wis. Stat. § 973.20(5)(c), which provides for reimbursement of amounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4576 - 2005-03-31
that this restitution order was authorized by Wis. Stat. § 973.20(5)(c), which provides for reimbursement of amounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4576 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Angela M.W. v. Timothy E.D.
will not be published. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4, STATS. No. 98-1043-FT(C) HOOVER, J. (concurring). I concur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13878 - 2014-09-15
will not be published. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4, STATS. No. 98-1043-FT(C) HOOVER, J. (concurring). I concur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13878 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
court for Winnebago County: SCOTT C. WOLDT, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, Nettesheim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29106 - 2014-09-15
court for Winnebago County: SCOTT C. WOLDT, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, Nettesheim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29106 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Village of Chenequa, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chad C. Schmalz, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139955 - 2015-04-21
Village of Chenequa, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chad C. Schmalz, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139955 - 2015-04-21
[PDF]
State v. Sawyer County Board of Appeals
shall be observed and substantial justice done. WIS. STAT. § 59.694(7)(c). The State asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15979 - 2017-09-21
shall be observed and substantial justice done. WIS. STAT. § 59.694(7)(c). The State asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15979 - 2017-09-21
Sheboygan County v. John J.V.
substantial rights. Section 51.20(10)(c), Stats., provides that “[t]he court shall, in every stage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10319 - 2005-03-31
substantial rights. Section 51.20(10)(c), Stats., provides that “[t]he court shall, in every stage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10319 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by statute. See WIS. STAT. §§ 346.65(2)(am)2., 343.301(1g), 343.30(1q)(b)3., and (1q)(c). Upon my
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181093 - 2017-09-21
by statute. See WIS. STAT. §§ 346.65(2)(am)2., 343.301(1g), 343.30(1q)(b)3., and (1q)(c). Upon my
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Huser Implement, Inc. v. Robert Wendt
, the ordinary credit transaction rules apply. Section 421.301(27)(c). The trial court’s factual finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13891 - 2014-09-15
, the ordinary credit transaction rules apply. Section 421.301(27)(c). The trial court’s factual finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13891 - 2014-09-15
County of Jefferson v. Dale W. Prout
. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2003-04). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7601 - 2005-03-31
. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2003-04). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7601 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Heidi Conde v. Robert Krueger
was required to prove alienation, and (c) Wendorf, whose testimony the trial court primarily relied on, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5484 - 2017-09-19
was required to prove alienation, and (c) Wendorf, whose testimony the trial court primarily relied on, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5484 - 2017-09-19