Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45921 - 45930 of 82664 for case codes/1000.
Search results 45921 - 45930 of 82664 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the present case. The court determined, however, that Wakefield could permissibly testify regarding whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
in the present case. The court determined, however, that Wakefield could permissibly testify regarding whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
after revocation of probation for misdemeanor battery in another case. The nine-month sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42986 - 2014-09-15
after revocation of probation for misdemeanor battery in another case. The nine-month sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42986 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gregory L. Schroeder
factors: the length of delay requested; whether there is competent counsel available to try the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13026 - 2005-03-31
factors: the length of delay requested; whether there is competent counsel available to try the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13026 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey A.M.
to the judgment.” ¶9 Rather, the evidentiary ruling at issue in this case is a transitory one made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7008 - 2005-03-31
to the judgment.” ¶9 Rather, the evidentiary ruling at issue in this case is a transitory one made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7008 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or whether the circuit court should consult Seiler’s older case files. Trial counsel noted that Seiler had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206458 - 2018-01-03
or whether the circuit court should consult Seiler’s older case files. Trial counsel noted that Seiler had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206458 - 2018-01-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782690 - 2024-04-02
a review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782690 - 2024-04-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
” instructions which provide: Legislation and case law presume that in multiple[-]case situations, sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33708 - 2014-09-15
” instructions which provide: Legislation and case law presume that in multiple[-]case situations, sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33708 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of proving the existence of exigent circumstances. As in other Fourth Amendment cases, the determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29587 - 2014-09-15
of proving the existence of exigent circumstances. As in other Fourth Amendment cases, the determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29587 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to say that the State offered no evidence of the items’ value in this case. There was testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
to say that the State offered no evidence of the items’ value in this case. There was testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
State v. William A. Rouse
2002 WI App 107 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0774-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3752 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 107 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0774-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3752 - 2005-03-31