Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4631 - 4640 of 15225 for 2013.
Search results 4631 - 4640 of 15225 for 2013.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
about the Denny’s celebration. See State v. Travis, 2013 WI 38, ¶48, 347 Wis. 2d 142, 832 N.W.2d 491
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197121 - 2017-09-26
about the Denny’s celebration. See State v. Travis, 2013 WI 38, ¶48, 347 Wis. 2d 142, 832 N.W.2d 491
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197121 - 2017-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 15, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100888 - 2013-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 15, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100888 - 2013-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to be impartial in Langlois’ 2013 case, see WIS. STAT. § 757.19(2)(g), or that he remembered Langlois from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213012 - 2018-05-23
to be impartial in Langlois’ 2013 case, see WIS. STAT. § 757.19(2)(g), or that he remembered Langlois from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213012 - 2018-05-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT II June 12, 2013 To: Hon. Mary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97871 - 2014-09-15
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT II June 12, 2013 To: Hon. Mary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97871 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(h) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141484 - 2015-05-12
is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(h) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141484 - 2015-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm the circuit court because Keniston did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141127 - 2017-09-21
disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm the circuit court because Keniston did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141127 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Castillo-Puac received a copy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146155 - 2015-08-18
809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Castillo-Puac received a copy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146155 - 2015-08-18
CA Blank Order
. Ricky Earl Rouse, pro se, appeals the order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14) motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
. Ricky Earl Rouse, pro se, appeals the order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14) motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154326 - 2017-09-21
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154326 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2013-14), 1 which would not help him in a new trial because the alleged victim has already testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161755 - 2017-09-21
) (2013-14), 1 which would not help him in a new trial because the alleged victim has already testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161755 - 2017-09-21