Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46301 - 46310 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 46301 - 46310 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) there is any arguably meritorious claim for challenging the sentence imposed. Counsel has thoroughly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294343 - 2020-10-07
) there is any arguably meritorious claim for challenging the sentence imposed. Counsel has thoroughly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294343 - 2020-10-07
Village of Oregon v. Frank P. Sauer
ordinance. He claims that the trial court erred when it derived a “negative inference” from his failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15748 - 2005-03-31
ordinance. He claims that the trial court erred when it derived a “negative inference” from his failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15748 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ella Mae Galindo v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of LIRC regarding the applicant’s claim of injury. The circuit court’s July 27, 1998, memorandum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14475 - 2017-09-21
of LIRC regarding the applicant’s claim of injury. The circuit court’s July 27, 1998, memorandum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14475 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) (noting that “a defense attorney has a duty to advance all colorable claims and defenses” (quoted source
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165067 - 2017-09-21
) (noting that “a defense attorney has a duty to advance all colorable claims and defenses” (quoted source
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165067 - 2017-09-21
State v. Carl J. Knapp
of a minor. Knapp asserts that the presentence report erroneously claimed he admitted to such a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9261 - 2005-03-31
of a minor. Knapp asserts that the presentence report erroneously claimed he admitted to such a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, including any claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552331 - 2022-08-09
, including any claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552331 - 2022-08-09
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Garrigan
that relates to the claimed defects. No(s). 98-1781-CR 4 By the Court.—Judgment affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14183 - 2014-09-15
that relates to the claimed defects. No(s). 98-1781-CR 4 By the Court.—Judgment affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14183 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mary Gillies v. Milwaukee County
review of the Board’s action. The petition claimed that the Board’s decision was contrary to law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14206 - 2014-09-15
review of the Board’s action. The petition claimed that the Board’s decision was contrary to law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14206 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dariell D. Cross
merit. Furthermore, Cross’s plea waived any nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14404 - 2014-09-15
merit. Furthermore, Cross’s plea waived any nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14404 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gloria Mack
husband, Richard Mack, filed a cross-claim against him in a separate action in 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10946 - 2017-09-19
husband, Richard Mack, filed a cross-claim against him in a separate action in 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10946 - 2017-09-19