Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46431 - 46440 of 84303 for case number.
Search results 46431 - 46440 of 84303 for case number.
State v. Mark S. Mielke
2002 WI App 251 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-3116-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4616 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 251 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-3116-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4616 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
Ashland County v. Lisa R.
was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order that included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17747 - 2005-04-18
was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order that included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17747 - 2005-04-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54236 - 2014-09-15
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54236 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Morrow’s arguments and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Morrow’s arguments and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
State v. Marco A. Villa
with the attorneys or the victim/witness people, but perhaps has been a witness in a case? Dean Gitzlaff made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13051 - 2005-03-31
with the attorneys or the victim/witness people, but perhaps has been a witness in a case? Dean Gitzlaff made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13051 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205550 - 2017-12-12
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205550 - 2017-12-12
[PDF]
Robert Owens, Jr. v. Shoreline Real Estate Co., Inc.
case. Owens was a tenant at 1104 North Marshall Street, #604, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7088 - 2017-09-20
case. Owens was a tenant at 1104 North Marshall Street, #604, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7088 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060062 - 2026-01-14
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060062 - 2026-01-14
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert Glickman
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1758-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17123 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1758-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17123 - 2005-03-31