Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46451 - 46460 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 46451 - 46460 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
Paula Steinmetz v. Thomas Steinmetz
, Paula moved the court under § 806.07, Stats., to reopen the judgment of divorce[2] claiming that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13008 - 2005-03-31
, Paula moved the court under § 806.07, Stats., to reopen the judgment of divorce[2] claiming that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13008 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Lee Moore
). 1 Although Moore belatedly alleges that he “did not know the basis for the claim [previously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21256 - 2017-09-21
). 1 Although Moore belatedly alleges that he “did not know the basis for the claim [previously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21256 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Clarice Lehn v. Michael J. Kurzawa
. No. 94-3187 -3- The appellant's second issue on appeal is his claim that Lehn's destruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8331 - 2017-09-19
. No. 94-3187 -3- The appellant's second issue on appeal is his claim that Lehn's destruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8331 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Susan L. Maginn v. Richard D. Maginn
. 2 Richard claims a specific error of fact in the trial court's calculation of Susan's income. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10640 - 2017-09-20
. 2 Richard claims a specific error of fact in the trial court's calculation of Susan's income. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10640 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
156, 159, 493 N.W.2d 23 (1992). Claims of multiplicity are analyzed using a two-prong test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30122 - 2014-09-15
156, 159, 493 N.W.2d 23 (1992). Claims of multiplicity are analyzed using a two-prong test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30122 - 2014-09-15
State v. Richard T. Harder
and, implicitly, that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea based on this error. We reject this claim because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5405 - 2005-03-31
and, implicitly, that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea based on this error. We reject this claim because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5405 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lonna L. Handschke
not disclose them. She has not offered any reason why she did not disclose them or claimed that she acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12336 - 2005-03-31
not disclose them. She has not offered any reason why she did not disclose them or claimed that she acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12336 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of his claim. We agree with the circuit court’s initial determination that the sentencing court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33516 - 2014-09-15
of his claim. We agree with the circuit court’s initial determination that the sentencing court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33516 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William E. Hampton
and constitutes consent to the imposition of sentence, despite the defendant's claim of innocence. Id. at 32, 38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9599 - 2017-09-19
and constitutes consent to the imposition of sentence, despite the defendant's claim of innocence. Id. at 32, 38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9599 - 2017-09-19
Marsha Lubinski v. Robert Lubinski
claims that he will have Ryan a minimum of forty-one percent of the year, the trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10613 - 2005-03-31
claims that he will have Ryan a minimum of forty-one percent of the year, the trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10613 - 2005-03-31