Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46741 - 46750 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 46741 - 46750 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
there was a significant change in circumstances. Id. ¶8 We conclude the stipulated facts in the present case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58078 - 2010-12-20
there was a significant change in circumstances. Id. ¶8 We conclude the stipulated facts in the present case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58078 - 2010-12-20
State v. Steven Schelk
(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The OWI, PAC and possession charges were filed in two separate cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13485 - 2005-03-31
(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The OWI, PAC and possession charges were filed in two separate cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13485 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven Schelk
(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The OWI, PAC and possession charges were filed in two separate cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13486 - 2005-03-31
(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The OWI, PAC and possession charges were filed in two separate cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13486 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] In December 2009, Jennifer and Dane County entered into agreements to “hold [] open” the cases until May 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65478 - 2011-06-08
] In December 2009, Jennifer and Dane County entered into agreements to “hold [] open” the cases until May 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65478 - 2011-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 948.11(2)(a),[2] with a felony intimidation of a witness charge in a companion case dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127589 - 2014-11-10
. Stat. § 948.11(2)(a),[2] with a felony intimidation of a witness charge in a companion case dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127589 - 2014-11-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm. ¶2 This is the third time Joseph’s case is before this court. Joseph was convicted of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157698 - 2017-09-21
affirm. ¶2 This is the third time Joseph’s case is before this court. Joseph was convicted of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157698 - 2017-09-21
State v. Patricia A. Weed
716 (1997), claiming that these cases effectively overruled State v. Simpson, 185 Wis. 2d 772, 519 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4032 - 2005-03-31
716 (1997), claiming that these cases effectively overruled State v. Simpson, 185 Wis. 2d 772, 519 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4032 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
SCR CHAPTER 71
of a specific case are not part of the verbatim record of the case. (5) The director of state courts shall
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248899 - 2019-10-17
of a specific case are not part of the verbatim record of the case. (5) The director of state courts shall
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248899 - 2019-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317065 - 2020-12-22
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317065 - 2020-12-22
Barron County v. Vicki L. Buchner
. ¶8 The question in this case is whether the facts Tripp observed satisfied this level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4542 - 2005-03-31
. ¶8 The question in this case is whether the facts Tripp observed satisfied this level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4542 - 2005-03-31