Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4711 - 4720 of 9550 for jurors.
Search results 4711 - 4720 of 9550 for jurors.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
preemptory strike upon the seating of an alternate juror and counsel failed to object to the seating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116161 - 2017-09-21
preemptory strike upon the seating of an alternate juror and counsel failed to object to the seating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116161 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth R. Zielinski
No. 95-0370-CR -4- convicted, the Zielinski jurors could be unduly persuaded that L.Z
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8615 - 2017-09-19
No. 95-0370-CR -4- convicted, the Zielinski jurors could be unduly persuaded that L.Z
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8615 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenneth R. Zielinski
of L.Z. as a sexual assault victim.[3] Because those assailants were convicted, the Zielinski jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8615 - 2005-03-31
of L.Z. as a sexual assault victim.[3] Because those assailants were convicted, the Zielinski jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8615 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
counsel failed to assert the right to a seventh preemptory strike upon the seating of an alternate juror
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116161 - 2005-03-31
counsel failed to assert the right to a seventh preemptory strike upon the seating of an alternate juror
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116161 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jimmie A. Woodford v. Dorothy Bolter
“wrong jurors” because ten of the jurors were “renters” and two of the jurors were “single family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5442 - 2017-09-19
“wrong jurors” because ten of the jurors were “renters” and two of the jurors were “single family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5442 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Pablo Parrilla
of potential jurors. The motion also sought individual voir dire with respect to questions about self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25829 - 2017-09-21
of potential jurors. The motion also sought individual voir dire with respect to questions about self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25829 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for drawing the jury evidenced any prejudice on the part of the prospective or impaneled jurors.’” State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192175 - 2017-09-21
for drawing the jury evidenced any prejudice on the part of the prospective or impaneled jurors.’” State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
The Third Branch, fall 2012
Fall 2012 H I G H L I G H T S 2 Director’s column 4 Sports 6 Retirements 8 Judicial Conference ...
/news/thirdbranch/docs/fall12.pdf - 2012-12-12
Fall 2012 H I G H L I G H T S 2 Director’s column 4 Sports 6 Retirements 8 Judicial Conference ...
/news/thirdbranch/docs/fall12.pdf - 2012-12-12
State v. Nathan John Lalor
error when it refused to excuse Juror 34 for cause. Lalor argues that Juror 34 was both objectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2322 - 2005-03-31
error when it refused to excuse Juror 34 for cause. Lalor argues that Juror 34 was both objectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2322 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nathan Lalor
error when it refused to excuse Juror 34 for cause. Lalor argues that Juror 34 was both objectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15368 - 2005-03-31
error when it refused to excuse Juror 34 for cause. Lalor argues that Juror 34 was both objectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15368 - 2005-03-31