Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47141 - 47150 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 47141 - 47150 of 84312 for case number.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and a default judgment was entered against him. ¶3 In case No. 2016AP966, Humphrey appealed the default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191676 - 2017-09-21
, and a default judgment was entered against him. ¶3 In case No. 2016AP966, Humphrey appealed the default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191676 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197059 - 2017-09-25
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197059 - 2017-09-25
State v. Babette Davis
discretion because it indicated its belief that probation should never be an option in any drug cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
discretion because it indicated its belief that probation should never be an option in any drug cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
Julie Ann Coyle v. Patrick Joseph Coyle
days of the entry of the December judgment, at the latest. Where, as here, the case is tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13190 - 2005-03-31
days of the entry of the December judgment, at the latest. Where, as here, the case is tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13190 - 2005-03-31
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Richard C. Glesner
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-3351-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17590 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-3351-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and mistrial. In January 2012, after the State announced it would retry the case, Brito’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149775 - 2017-09-21
and mistrial. In January 2012, after the State announced it would retry the case, Brito’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149775 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
2009 WI 22 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2007AP1849-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35710 - 2009-03-02
2009 WI 22 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2007AP1849-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35710 - 2009-03-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
385. The circuit court denied the motion, reasoning the present case was distinguished from Goodson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52437 - 2014-09-15
385. The circuit court denied the motion, reasoning the present case was distinguished from Goodson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52437 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert J. Klingbeil v. Gustav Perschke
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0488 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15167 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0488 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15167 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93296 - 2013-02-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93296 - 2013-02-21