Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47171 - 47180 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 47171 - 47180 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Michael H. Lauritzen v. Richard Gohlke
be that the Gohlkes would receive only $5,000, which they claimed was not their original understanding. Lauritzen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11875 - 2005-03-31
be that the Gohlkes would receive only $5,000, which they claimed was not their original understanding. Lauritzen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11875 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. He claims that the State failed to prove that he drove his motor vehicle while under the influence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841908 - 2024-08-28
. He claims that the State failed to prove that he drove his motor vehicle while under the influence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841908 - 2024-08-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel flatly refutes it.2 Likewise, there is no record support for Bleau’s conclusory claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331061 - 2021-02-03
counsel flatly refutes it.2 Likewise, there is no record support for Bleau’s conclusory claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331061 - 2021-02-03
CA Blank Order
not to disqualify himself, Rhonda’s claim for recusal was based on Wis. Stat. § 757.19(2)(g).[2] The basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110999 - 2014-04-29
not to disqualify himself, Rhonda’s claim for recusal was based on Wis. Stat. § 757.19(2)(g).[2] The basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110999 - 2014-04-29
State v. Michael A. VanPatter
denying his postconviction motion to modify the sentence. Van Patter claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10505 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion to modify the sentence. Van Patter claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10505 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul W. Schnelz
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because no probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11214 - 2017-09-19
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because no probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11214 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the plea. The no-merit report next addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123242 - 2017-09-21
to the plea. The no-merit report next addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123242 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
4 Kasper did not have his HSED at that time, and we discern no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759310 - 2024-02-08
4 Kasper did not have his HSED at that time, and we discern no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759310 - 2024-02-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel’s no-merit report thoroughly discusses whether any nonfrivolous claims arise from pretrial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550427 - 2022-08-03
counsel’s no-merit report thoroughly discusses whether any nonfrivolous claims arise from pretrial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550427 - 2022-08-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was grounded in a claimed inconsistency with the court’s intended sixty percent/forty percent income split
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813303 - 2024-06-19
was grounded in a claimed inconsistency with the court’s intended sixty percent/forty percent income split
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813303 - 2024-06-19