Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47301 - 47310 of 68502 for did.
Search results 47301 - 47310 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
likewise told her that he did not have a cell phone. ¶10 Niemuth confirmed that Douglas had denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357928 - 2021-04-20
likewise told her that he did not have a cell phone. ¶10 Niemuth confirmed that Douglas had denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357928 - 2021-04-20
[PDF]
WI APP 3
the house was not the Johnsons’ primary residence, it was a “dwelling” and the Johnsons did “occupy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74631 - 2014-09-15
the house was not the Johnsons’ primary residence, it was a “dwelling” and the Johnsons did “occupy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74631 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ralph J. Smith
passenger he does not know and he did not know Smith. He also indicated that he felt the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16287 - 2005-03-31
passenger he does not know and he did not know Smith. He also indicated that he felt the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16287 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the legality of the stop. He contends that the “trial court did not explicitly find that [the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50773 - 2010-06-08
the legality of the stop. He contends that the “trial court did not explicitly find that [the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50773 - 2010-06-08
State v. James E. Powell
contact in Illinois.” However, the prosecutor did not acknowledge that he possessed Tim's presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9474 - 2005-03-31
contact in Illinois.” However, the prosecutor did not acknowledge that he possessed Tim's presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9474 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Johnson
, the car did not move. We agree with the court of appeals’ statement that the State concedes that neither
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16979 - 2005-03-31
, the car did not move. We agree with the court of appeals’ statement that the State concedes that neither
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16979 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, because she did in fact carry him to term. Because we conclude that termination was supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28063 - 2014-09-15
, because she did in fact carry him to term. Because we conclude that termination was supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28063 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1) or (2) did not list fourth-degree sexual assault as a crime that may be prosecuted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107688 - 2017-09-21
(1) or (2) did not list fourth-degree sexual assault as a crime that may be prosecuted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107688 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our attention to two circuit court hearings where his counsel argued that Choudry did not receive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811776 - 2024-06-11
our attention to two circuit court hearings where his counsel argued that Choudry did not receive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811776 - 2024-06-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction over his second-offense OWI because, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=764421 - 2024-02-15
that the circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction over his second-offense OWI because, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=764421 - 2024-02-15