Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47331 - 47340 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 47331 - 47340 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Debra A. Maki v. Kathleen W. Allen
, J.[1] Kathleen W. Allen and her husband, Randolph S. Allen, arguing pro se, appeal a small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4715 - 2005-03-31
, J.[1] Kathleen W. Allen and her husband, Randolph S. Allen, arguing pro se, appeal a small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4715 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
stop.[2] He claims that his case is just the scenario identified by the Post court. We hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61344 - 2011-03-22
stop.[2] He claims that his case is just the scenario identified by the Post court. We hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61344 - 2011-03-22
[MS WORD]
FA-4138V: Income and Expense Statement
-9) MONTHLY DEDUCTIONS 11. Number of tax exemptions claimed
/formdisplay/FA-4138V.doc?formNumber=FA-4138V&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2023-01-23
-9) MONTHLY DEDUCTIONS 11. Number of tax exemptions claimed
/formdisplay/FA-4138V.doc?formNumber=FA-4138V&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2023-01-23
State v. Charles L. Wilson
reviewing speedy trial claims, we apply the clearly erroneous standard to the facts found by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21120 - 2006-01-30
reviewing speedy trial claims, we apply the clearly erroneous standard to the facts found by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21120 - 2006-01-30
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
to trial. These inconsistencies and discrepancies do not support a claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10865 - 2005-03-31
to trial. These inconsistencies and discrepancies do not support a claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10865 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph C. Reinsbach
from presenting this claim. The trial court's 1991 order decided this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9468 - 2005-03-31
from presenting this claim. The trial court's 1991 order decided this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9468 - 2005-03-31
Traci J. Purdy v. Brian M. Purdy
court could reasonably infer that a substantial amount of his claim accrued before he married Traci
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3813 - 2005-03-31
court could reasonably infer that a substantial amount of his claim accrued before he married Traci
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3813 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
ineffective- assistance-of-counsel claim” and had chosen to “raise[] an entirely different issue.” The State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191607 - 2017-09-21
ineffective- assistance-of-counsel claim” and had chosen to “raise[] an entirely different issue.” The State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191607 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
these constitutional arguments in the circuit court. Therefore, he forfeited his right to raise these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393004 - 2021-07-20
these constitutional arguments in the circuit court. Therefore, he forfeited his right to raise these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393004 - 2021-07-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as the State claimed. It was the jury’s function to decide issues of credibility, weigh the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338262 - 2021-02-24
as the State claimed. It was the jury’s function to decide issues of credibility, weigh the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338262 - 2021-02-24