Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47331 - 47340 of 82991 for simple case.
Search results 47331 - 47340 of 82991 for simple case.
State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
no contest plea testified that Penigar adamantly opposed taking his case to trial. They testified that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
no contest plea testified that Penigar adamantly opposed taking his case to trial. They testified that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 154
2007 WI App 154 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1963 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28868 - 2007-06-26
2007 WI App 154 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1963 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28868 - 2007-06-26
Thomas J. McPhetridge, Sr. v. Christine A. McPhetridge
are clearly distinguishable from the facts at bar as this case does not involve the sale of a property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20104 - 2007-06-04
are clearly distinguishable from the facts at bar as this case does not involve the sale of a property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20104 - 2007-06-04
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147839 - 2015-08-27
our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147839 - 2015-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
to permit the test. See Wis. Stat. § 343.305(9)(a)5. The only issue raised by Griese in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143236 - 2015-06-17
to permit the test. See Wis. Stat. § 343.305(9)(a)5. The only issue raised by Griese in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143236 - 2015-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS
case. The claim fails. ¶7 Wisconsin Stat. § 302.11(1g) went into effect in April 1994. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116991 - 2014-07-17
case. The claim fails. ¶7 Wisconsin Stat. § 302.11(1g) went into effect in April 1994. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116991 - 2014-07-17
Grand Chute Auto Sales, Inc. v. David W. Lehman
vehicle was taken.” Sec. 779.415(1m). ¶9 We now apply the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3786 - 2005-03-31
vehicle was taken.” Sec. 779.415(1m). ¶9 We now apply the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3786 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mack A. Kradenych
. Richards, 520 U.S. at 393-94. While it upheld the no-knock entry in that case based on the particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2713 - 2005-03-31
. Richards, 520 U.S. at 393-94. While it upheld the no-knock entry in that case based on the particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2713 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
or encouraging the child. The court stated, “One thing of particular note about this case is although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114853 - 2014-06-23
or encouraging the child. The court stated, “One thing of particular note about this case is although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114853 - 2014-06-23