Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4741 - 4750 of 29923 for des.
Search results 4741 - 4750 of 29923 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
the same methodology as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green Springs Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35455 - 2014-09-15
the same methodology as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green Springs Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35455 - 2014-09-15
John M. Maciolek v. Patrick L. Ross
review is de novo. Green Springs Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-15, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26544 - 2006-09-20
review is de novo. Green Springs Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-15, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26544 - 2006-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
requires the application of § 974.07 to specific facts, which presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88856 - 2012-10-31
requires the application of § 974.07 to specific facts, which presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88856 - 2012-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 325. “Whether the facts … fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31016 - 2007-12-03
. at 325. “Whether the facts … fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31016 - 2007-12-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. State v. Fawcett, 145 Wis. 2d 244, 249, 426 N.W.2d 91 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214763 - 2018-06-26
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. State v. Fawcett, 145 Wis. 2d 244, 249, 426 N.W.2d 91 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214763 - 2018-06-26
MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
distinct levels of deference to agency interpretations of statutes: great weight, due weight and de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8857 - 2005-03-31
distinct levels of deference to agency interpretations of statutes: great weight, due weight and de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8857 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Westhaven Associates, Ltd. v. C.C. of Madison, Inc.
judgment. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4210 - 2017-09-19
judgment. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4210 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation presents a question of law that is reviewed de novo.” Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243436 - 2019-07-16
interpretation presents a question of law that is reviewed de novo.” Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243436 - 2019-07-16
[PDF]
Department of Revenue v. Johnson Welding & Manufacturing Company, Inc.
it is entitled to “due weight” or “great bearing.” The lowest level of review, the de novo standard, is applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15989 - 2017-09-21
it is entitled to “due weight” or “great bearing.” The lowest level of review, the de novo standard, is applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15989 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 91
took during the “first-in” period. We review de novo the legal issues decided by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98257 - 2017-09-21
took during the “first-in” period. We review de novo the legal issues decided by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98257 - 2017-09-21