Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47551 - 47560 of 94107 for the law on sleep and all cases.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147375 - 2017-09-21

State v. Brian J. Salentine
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10122 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of disorderly conduct and one count of arson to a building. According to the complaint, the charges stemmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54852 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was entered as a result of “excusable neglect.” As defined in Wisconsin case law, “excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987464 - 2025-07-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
particular case presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112563 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
from those cases, and they remain good law. Id., ¶30. No. 2018AP1784 6 IT IS FURTHER
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252412 - 2020-01-16

CA Blank Order
a defendant’s claims are barred by Escalona-Naranjo in any particular case presents a question of law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112563 - 2014-05-13

COURT OF APPEALS
discretion presents a question of law that we decide independently. Id. ¶6 Terrance argues Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36792 - 2009-06-15

[PDF] NOTICE
on appeal, nor is there a minute sheet. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2007-08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36107 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
on the State’s case … is not substantial.”[3] ¶5 The court concluded if it “were to grant an adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36107 - 2009-04-06