Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47701 - 47710 of 57641 for id.
Search results 47701 - 47710 of 57641 for id.
State v. John W. Rodgers
. Id. Rodgers, as a passenger in the car, does not have standing to challenge the search of the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9363 - 2005-03-31
. Id. Rodgers, as a passenger in the car, does not have standing to challenge the search of the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9363 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brett E. Alford
. A reasonable probability is one that undermines confidence in the outcome. Id. We need not review whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11649 - 2005-03-31
. A reasonable probability is one that undermines confidence in the outcome. Id. We need not review whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11649 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerrald D. Niehoff
. Id. at 21-22. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2837 - 2005-03-31
. Id. at 21-22. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2837 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David J. Cee
). "Counsel need not be perfect, indeed not even very good, to be constitutionally adequate." Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11668 - 2017-09-19
). "Counsel need not be perfect, indeed not even very good, to be constitutionally adequate." Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11668 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Rodney E. Hill
that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. at 263, 528 N.W.2d at 13. We reject Hill's contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8312 - 2017-09-19
that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. at 263, 528 N.W.2d at 13. We reject Hill's contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8312 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
standard is viewed independently. Id. Feinberg’s identification was based on multiple face-to-face
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125185 - 2017-09-21
standard is viewed independently. Id. Feinberg’s identification was based on multiple face-to-face
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125185 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to allege a legal theory that fits the alleged facts, id. at 521, Alston has not persuaded us that a court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196693 - 2017-09-21
to allege a legal theory that fits the alleged facts, id. at 521, Alston has not persuaded us that a court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196693 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the act. Such an admission renders superfluous the explanation of party-to- the-crime liability. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150853 - 2017-09-21
the act. Such an admission renders superfluous the explanation of party-to- the-crime liability. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or the reasons for them unless they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶19. Endries contends that his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522055 - 2022-05-17
or the reasons for them unless they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶19. Endries contends that his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522055 - 2022-05-17
State v. Daniel H. Callahan
for the verdict. See id. (We affirm unless evidence, when viewed most favorably to the verdict, is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19772 - 2005-09-28
for the verdict. See id. (We affirm unless evidence, when viewed most favorably to the verdict, is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19772 - 2005-09-28