Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47741 - 47750 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 47741 - 47750 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Mark E. Rahoi
). No. 02-2678-CR 2 Rahoi claims the sentence imposed was unduly harsh and excessive. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5741 - 2017-09-19
). No. 02-2678-CR 2 Rahoi claims the sentence imposed was unduly harsh and excessive. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5741 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Barbette Montee Peterson v. John Kojis
months to seek the injunction somehow affects the validity of her claim of harassment. No. 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3113 - 2017-09-20
months to seek the injunction somehow affects the validity of her claim of harassment. No. 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3113 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
George W. Schmidt v. Linda L. Schmidt
decision to waive a claim to maintenance. Further, Linda's termination occurred a mere three months after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10839 - 2017-09-20
decision to waive a claim to maintenance. Further, Linda's termination occurred a mere three months after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10839 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Estep
to modify his sentence claiming that it was unduly harsh, that the court did not give sufficient weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9067 - 2017-09-19
to modify his sentence claiming that it was unduly harsh, that the court did not give sufficient weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9067 - 2017-09-19
Rusk County v. Harold S., Sr.
children’s best interests. Harold appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Harold claims that the fact-finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20787 - 2005-12-27
children’s best interests. Harold appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Harold claims that the fact-finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20787 - 2005-12-27
James W. Parlow v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
First, Parlow claims that the issue was raised in his initial appeal letters. Regardless of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19702 - 2005-09-21
First, Parlow claims that the issue was raised in his initial appeal letters. Regardless of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19702 - 2005-09-21
Certification
, the sewerage district brought a claim for maintaining a nuisance against the City of Milwaukee for damage
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34109 - 2008-09-24
, the sewerage district brought a claim for maintaining a nuisance against the City of Milwaukee for damage
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34109 - 2008-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence—one of the essential components of a “new factor” claim. See State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759775 - 2024-02-07
sentence—one of the essential components of a “new factor” claim. See State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759775 - 2024-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Carl J. Knapp
erroneously claimed he admitted to such a conviction, although the conviction was not supported by any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9262 - 2017-09-19
erroneously claimed he admitted to such a conviction, although the conviction was not supported by any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9262 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the defense. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984). However, his claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80546 - 2014-09-15
to the defense. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984). However, his claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80546 - 2014-09-15