Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4781 - 4790 of 30012 for consulta de causas.
Search results 4781 - 4790 of 30012 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
interpretations of statutes: great weight, due weight and de novo review. See Jicha v. DILHR, 169 Wis.2d 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8857 - 2017-09-19
interpretations of statutes: great weight, due weight and de novo review. See Jicha v. DILHR, 169 Wis.2d 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8857 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wanninger. We will address each of her arguments in turn. ¶8 We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80711 - 2014-09-15
Wanninger. We will address each of her arguments in turn. ¶8 We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80711 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
requires the application of § 974.07 to specific facts, which presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88856 - 2012-10-31
requires the application of § 974.07 to specific facts, which presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88856 - 2012-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the question” de novo. Olson v. Farrar, 2012 WI 3, ¶24, 338 Wis. 2d 215, 809 N.W.2d 1. “We review a grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399165 - 2021-07-27
the question” de novo. Olson v. Farrar, 2012 WI 3, ¶24, 338 Wis. 2d 215, 809 N.W.2d 1. “We review a grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399165 - 2021-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the terms of the CHIPS order denying them physical placement and visitation. ¶12 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69466 - 2014-09-15
the terms of the CHIPS order denying them physical placement and visitation. ¶12 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69466 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the sufficiency of the evidence de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862785 - 2024-11-07
to the sufficiency of the evidence de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862785 - 2024-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those facts demonstrate that the defendant’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906445 - 2025-01-28
they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those facts demonstrate that the defendant’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906445 - 2025-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 325. “Whether the facts … fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31016 - 2007-12-03
. at 325. “Whether the facts … fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31016 - 2007-12-03
WI App 32 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP593 Complete Title of ...
exists.” See id. The third and lowest level of deference, de novo review, applies “where it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77694 - 2012-03-27
exists.” See id. The third and lowest level of deference, de novo review, applies “where it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77694 - 2012-03-27
Anne Marie Rosplock v. David Rosplock
of maintenance. David sought and received a de novo hearing on his motion. The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11816 - 2005-03-31
of maintenance. David sought and received a de novo hearing on his motion. The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11816 - 2005-03-31