Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4791 - 4800 of 50071 for our.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
discretionary determination that his violations warranted revocation and incarceration. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288285 - 2020-09-16

COURT OF APPEALS
was intended by … our legislature in dealing with situations like this…. The fact of the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41628 - 2009-10-06

CA Blank Order
motion to withdraw her plea, and the validity of the sentences imposed. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92004 - 2013-01-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
4 of law for our de novo review. Pritchard v. Madison Metro. Sch. Dist., 2001 WI App 62, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546539 - 2022-07-21

COURT OF APPEALS
are not the fact finder. Our function is to review the decision made by the jury, and we do that based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75243 - 2011-12-14

COURT OF APPEALS
not contravene public policy. We therefore focus our analysis on the second inquiry. ¶7 Beer and Toot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59866 - 2011-02-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-NM 2 but she has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562064 - 2022-09-07

[PDF] State v. Charles E. Carthage
Wis. 2d at 507. ¶9 Carthage argues our review of sentences should be broader than the erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6431 - 2017-09-19

State v. Nicholas R. Simonet
of that charge. Our commonsense view of the totality of the circumstances convinces us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15007 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
are in place to ensure that a defendant’s plea is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265008 - 2020-06-23