Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47961 - 47970 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 47961 - 47970 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there is no arguable merit to seeking No. 2023AP2004-CRNM 3 plea withdrawal based on a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814801 - 2024-06-24
that there is no arguable merit to seeking No. 2023AP2004-CRNM 3 plea withdrawal based on a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814801 - 2024-06-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255244 - 2020-02-25
be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255244 - 2020-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing Kinney. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909870 - 2025-02-04
to a claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing Kinney. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909870 - 2025-02-04
Dawn Garcia v. Janet Giesen
as the designated beneficiary arose from her presence at the meeting. Garcia claims that Jerome’s actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6096 - 2005-03-31
as the designated beneficiary arose from her presence at the meeting. Garcia claims that Jerome’s actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6096 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cara M. Wehrenberg v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
, not on contract law. Therefore, we reject Wehrenberg’s claims. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3832 - 2017-09-20
, not on contract law. Therefore, we reject Wehrenberg’s claims. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3832 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for his criminal conduct under WIS. STAT. § 971.15(1),3 rejecting his claim that he was not responsible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462389 - 2021-12-14
for his criminal conduct under WIS. STAT. § 971.15(1),3 rejecting his claim that he was not responsible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462389 - 2021-12-14
State v. Michael A. White
, the court repeatedly noted it considered the evidence highly probative to refute White’s claim that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5778 - 2005-03-31
, the court repeatedly noted it considered the evidence highly probative to refute White’s claim that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5778 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. 668, 687 (1984). To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49464 - 2010-04-28
. 668, 687 (1984). To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49464 - 2010-04-28
Cara M. Wehrenberg v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
of statutory construction, not on contract law. Therefore, we reject Wehrenberg’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3832 - 2005-03-31
of statutory construction, not on contract law. Therefore, we reject Wehrenberg’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3832 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to provide a reasoned basis for its reconfinement decision.” He makes this claim based on the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60273 - 2014-09-15
to provide a reasoned basis for its reconfinement decision.” He makes this claim based on the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60273 - 2014-09-15