Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48031 - 48040 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 48031 - 48040 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
’ decision to continue the case after they were informed of the DNR’s limited role and after Smith’s attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31
’ decision to continue the case after they were informed of the DNR’s limited role and after Smith’s attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of V.R.’s home. In January 2019, a criminal complaint in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727944 - 2023-11-14
of V.R.’s home. In January 2019, a criminal complaint in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727944 - 2023-11-14
Edwin Tallard v. Northern States Power Company
disputed factual matters as though the case had been tried as a bench trial on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12263 - 2005-03-31
disputed factual matters as though the case had been tried as a bench trial on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12263 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228136 - 2018-11-20
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228136 - 2018-11-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
and cause remanded. No. 2006AP2976 2 ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.1 This case involves various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28910 - 2014-09-15
and cause remanded. No. 2006AP2976 2 ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.1 This case involves various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28910 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
., 2002 WI 1, ¶46, 249 Wis. 2d at 520, 637 N.W.2d at 745–746. ¶12 In this case, the prosecutor made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68268 - 2011-07-25
., 2002 WI 1, ¶46, 249 Wis. 2d at 520, 637 N.W.2d at 745–746. ¶12 In this case, the prosecutor made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68268 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the case. The motion maintained that the prosecution was barred by the statute of limitations. It further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97846 - 2013-06-11
the case. The motion maintained that the prosecution was barred by the statute of limitations. It further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97846 - 2013-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
to disclaim his or her interest in such real property, in which case the disclaiming person’s interest shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72468 - 2011-10-19
to disclaim his or her interest in such real property, in which case the disclaiming person’s interest shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72468 - 2011-10-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the initial stop in this case, as in Campshure, was based on the officer’s suspicion of OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70214 - 2014-09-15
the initial stop in this case, as in Campshure, was based on the officer’s suspicion of OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70214 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard C. Plank
2005 WI APP 109 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2004AP2280-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17796 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI APP 109 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2004AP2280-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17796 - 2017-09-21