Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4811 - 4820 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.

State v. Patricia K. Messner
contends that there was no probable cause for her arrest, that the trial court erred in denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2632 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
Does information indicating that an individual has been questioned, apprehended, taken into custody
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=852097 - 2024-09-17

[PDF] State of the Judiciary Address 2019
together. As you know, the counties have joint responsibility with the State to fund Wisconsin's
/publications/speeches/docs/judaddress19.pdf - 2019-11-06

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
damages recovered by the plaintiff.” Wis. Stat. § 895.043(6) (emphasis added). “The rule of joint
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036485 - 2025-11-07

CA Blank Order
received treatment in a custodial setting. The maximum possible sentence Bass could have received was forty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143093 - 2015-06-10

[PDF] Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
Savinski was committed to the custody of the Department of Health and Family Services as a sexually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ilir Aliji
) the police lacked probable cause to arrest him; (4) the trial court should have granted his motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14150 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Nathan Liszewski
to §§ 940.01(1) and 939.32, STATS. Liszewski also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11294 - 2017-09-19

State v. Nathan Liszewski
postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. In his motion, Liszewski claimed that his counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11294 - 2005-03-31

State v. Vernon L. Walker
of first-degree intentional homicide while armed, as party to a crime, and from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7786 - 2005-03-31