Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48101 - 48110 of 58974 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 48101 - 48110 of 58974 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Clinton T. Donahue
of possessing THC, as a second offense. He challenges the denial of a suppression motion, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4060 - 2017-09-20
of possessing THC, as a second offense. He challenges the denial of a suppression motion, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4060 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no other basis for a claim that plea withdrawal is necessary to avert a manifest injustice. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162597 - 2017-09-21
no other basis for a claim that plea withdrawal is necessary to avert a manifest injustice. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162597 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Wisniewski claims that his rights against double jeopardy were violated because he was convicted of felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27385 - 2014-09-15
. Wisniewski claims that his rights against double jeopardy were violated because he was convicted of felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27385 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300376 - 2020-10-29
of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300376 - 2020-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
We affirm for the reasons discussed below. Romero claims that he was denied due process because he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206146 - 2017-12-21
We affirm for the reasons discussed below. Romero claims that he was denied due process because he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206146 - 2017-12-21
[PDF]
May Table of Unpublished Opinions
to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18541 - 2017-09-21
to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18541 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for an ineffective-assistance claim requires the defendant to show that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79434 - 2014-09-15
for an ineffective-assistance claim requires the defendant to show that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79434 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Sherman Williams
armed, contrary to §§ 941.30(1), and 939.63, STATS. Williams claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9024 - 2017-09-19
armed, contrary to §§ 941.30(1), and 939.63, STATS. Williams claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9024 - 2017-09-19
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
earnings are provided in Wis. Stat. § 102.11(1) (1995-96). In addressing Vanhof’s claim, LIRC concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16291 - 2005-03-31
earnings are provided in Wis. Stat. § 102.11(1) (1995-96). In addressing Vanhof’s claim, LIRC concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16291 - 2005-03-31
Multi-State Specialized Transit, Inc. v. McCain Food Services, Inc.
on pretense. An unsupported claim that Multi-State violated State environmental laws would be actionable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3805 - 2005-03-31
on pretense. An unsupported claim that Multi-State violated State environmental laws would be actionable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3805 - 2005-03-31