Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4821 - 4830 of 6666 for mix.

State v. Jacob J. Faust
, Krajewski is internally inconsistent and sends mixed signals. I join my colleagues in this case only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6358 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
is a mixed standard of review. First, No. 2009AP1498-CR 11 we determine whether the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48431 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
possession presents mixed questions of fact and law. Klinefelter v. Dutch, 161 Wis. 2d 28, 37, 467 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35980 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
was an “occurrence”), and Glendenning’s Limestone & Ready-Mix Co. v. Reimer, 2006 WI App 161, ¶¶42-43, 295 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82624 - 2012-05-16

[PDF] State v. Jerome Sellars
of counsel present mixed questions of law and fact. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 633-34, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12792 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
¶28 “An ineffective assistance of counsel claim presents a mixed question of fact and law.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710102 - 2023-10-03

[PDF] Frontsheet
2 See Wingra Redi-Mix, Inc. v. Burial Sites Preservation Bd., 2018 WI 54, ¶1, 381 Wis. 2d 601, 912
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241648 - 2019-06-04

[PDF] NOTICE
of constitutional fact presents a mixed question of law and fact to which we apply a two-step standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53404 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Certification
claiming ineffective assistance of revocation counsel, the mixed standard of review applies: findings
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166035 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of whether there has been a substantial change in circumstances presents a mixed question of fact and law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157680 - 2017-09-21