Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4821 - 4830 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 4821 - 4830 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Penny L. Swanson
challenges the trial court's refusal to quash a search warrant and suppress evidence gathered as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8845 - 2017-09-19
challenges the trial court's refusal to quash a search warrant and suppress evidence gathered as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8845 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Marvin E. Miller
of examining automobile searches on a case-by-case basis to determine whether valid safety concerns were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7831 - 2017-09-19
of examining automobile searches on a case-by-case basis to determine whether valid safety concerns were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7831 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s denial of her suppression motion. Kostuck-Hass contends that the search warrant leading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135364 - 2015-02-24
the trial court’s denial of her suppression motion. Kostuck-Hass contends that the search warrant leading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135364 - 2015-02-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Kostuck-Hass contends that the search warrant leading to the discovery of contraband in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135364 - 2017-09-21
motion. Kostuck-Hass contends that the search warrant leading to the discovery of contraband in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135364 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
violated the Fourth Amendment when they conducted a pat-down search of him for weapons after stopping his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72333 - 2011-10-17
violated the Fourth Amendment when they conducted a pat-down search of him for weapons after stopping his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72333 - 2011-10-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they conducted a pat-down search of him for weapons after stopping his car for traffic violations. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72333 - 2014-09-15
they conducted a pat-down search of him for weapons after stopping his car for traffic violations. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72333 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Douglas J. Miller
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject Miller’s argument. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject Miller’s argument. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Benjamin L. Stewart
have to have a search warrant on cases like this.” He then testified that he said “I am not going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8917 - 2017-09-19
have to have a search warrant on cases like this.” He then testified that he said “I am not going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8917 - 2017-09-19
State v. Benjamin L. Stewart
responded, “We don't have to have a search warrant on cases like this.” He then testified that he said “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8917 - 2005-03-31
responded, “We don't have to have a search warrant on cases like this.” He then testified that he said “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8917 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 59
). ¶35 LaCount argues that the search and seizure in the present case violated the prohibition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33001 - 2014-09-15
). ¶35 LaCount argues that the search and seizure in the present case violated the prohibition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33001 - 2014-09-15