Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4821 - 4830 of 83778 for simple case search/1000.

Frontsheet
question in this case is whether the officers' search of Artic's upstairs residence was also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52199 - 2010-07-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The search warrant in the present case reads as follows: WHEREAS, Eric Essinger has this day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84134 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Id. at 336. The search warrant in the present case reads as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84134 - 2012-07-02

COURT OF APPEALS
Whether such reasonable suspicion exists to justify a protective search requires a case-by-case evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
such reasonable suspicion exists to justify a protective search requires a case-by-case evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88774 - 2014-09-15

State v. Tory M. Meyer
. IV. ¶37 In sum, we conclude that the anticipatory search warrant in the present case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17140 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Tory M. Meyer
in this case did not authorize a search for the intercepted mail package alone; rather, the warrant also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17140 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Terry H. Redmond
in two cases. The State maintains that the searches in both cases were justified because in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12536 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Stanley Egerson
in two cases. The State maintains that the searches in both cases were justified because in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12695 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
granting Julian Thomas’s motion to suppress evidence collected during a search of Thomas’s living
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216144 - 2018-07-26