Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48201 - 48210 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 48201 - 48210 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Suzanne Marie Johnson v. Norman T. Johnson
to $41,323.00. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by including in the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14132 - 2005-03-31
to $41,323.00. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by including in the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14132 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Verne J. Stark
of driving while intoxicated. Even so, the phone tip from another motorist was not anonymous, as claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5781 - 2017-09-19
of driving while intoxicated. Even so, the phone tip from another motorist was not anonymous, as claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5781 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims, after the time for direct appeal has passed, arises under WIS. STAT. § 974.06. A § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069253 - 2026-01-29
claims, after the time for direct appeal has passed, arises under WIS. STAT. § 974.06. A § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069253 - 2026-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
to case.” Id., ¶39. ¶5 Claiming that her physical condition bears no “reasonable nexus to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75275 - 2011-12-19
to case.” Id., ¶39. ¶5 Claiming that her physical condition bears no “reasonable nexus to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75275 - 2011-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and the record reveals no arguably meritorious basis for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859920 - 2024-10-09
, and the record reveals no arguably meritorious basis for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859920 - 2024-10-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not follow the plea agreement.3 Accordingly, we discern no arguable merit to any claim based on Coleman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860562 - 2024-10-10
not follow the plea agreement.3 Accordingly, we discern no arguable merit to any claim based on Coleman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860562 - 2024-10-10
COURT OF APPEALS
’ extended supervision. In his postconviction motion, VanDynHoven claims he believed the agreement called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106606 - 2014-01-13
’ extended supervision. In his postconviction motion, VanDynHoven claims he believed the agreement called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106606 - 2014-01-13
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Ring does not claim that any of the defenses found in SCR 22.22(3) apply. Attorney Ring further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245569 - 2019-10-02
Ring does not claim that any of the defenses found in SCR 22.22(3) apply. Attorney Ring further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245569 - 2019-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241512 - 2019-05-30
the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241512 - 2019-05-30
State v. Brett E. Alford
a written statement. Alford refused to sign a statement, claiming that he had had too much to drink. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11649 - 2005-03-31
a written statement. Alford refused to sign a statement, claiming that he had had too much to drink. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11649 - 2005-03-31