Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48371 - 48380 of 57708 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
in determining whether the stop was justified. Id., ¶26. Here, since the officer already had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53819 - 2010-08-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that it is expected to consider at the original sentencing hearing. See id.; and cf. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 131
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712544 - 2023-10-11

[PDF] State v. Robert B. Frier
things, the person’s mental history and present mental condition. Id. “Substantially probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5377 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI 116
novo review. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline given the particular facts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89505 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Warren J. Pik
. Id. Pik argues that the manifest injustice present here is the trial court's failure to inquire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8991 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gary L. Stene
be sufficient to lead a reasonable police officer to believe that guilt is more than a possibility. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19021 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
and the courts might deal with incompetent defendants during postconviction proceedings. See id. at 131-36. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132843 - 2015-01-12

State v. James B.
appearing in the record.” Id. at 303, 251 N.W.2d at 205. Subsections 48.18(5) and (6), Stats., set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9235 - 2005-03-31

State v. Marisol A.
a reasonable determination. Id. ¶10 Marisol contends that the evidence was improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19147 - 2005-08-01

COURT OF APPEALS
). The competing inferences, however, must be “reasonable.” Id. Further, “[a]ffidavits in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58803 - 2011-01-11