Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48541 - 48550 of 83010 for case codes/1000.

State v. Cindy Lou Kusisto
is entitled to have the enhanced parts of her sentences commuted pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 973.13 (“In any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329157 - 2021-02-02

[PDF] County of Winnebago v. Ralph Wachtveitl
. Wachtveitl argues, however, that this case is governed by State v. Swanson, 164 Wis.2d 437, 475 N.W.2d 148
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8838 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950306 - 2025-05-07

State v. John W. Rodgers
in a bicycle tire. Rodgers filed motions to suppress evidence and to dismiss the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9363 - 2005-03-31

Mercy Medical Center of Oshkosh v. Albert Fisher
a prima facie case and that Fisher’s affidavit in opposition failed to meet the statutory requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2940 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798466 - 2024-05-14

[PDF] IW-1501; Petition For Appointment of Guardian (Full/Limited/Temporary/Emergency Guardianship) (48.9795, Wis. Stats.) ICWA
Welfare Act Case No. I STATE ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF: 1. Child’s Address
/formdisplay/IW-1501.pdf?formNumber=IW-1501&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-03-27

[PDF] State v. David Scott Mathis
court found: In this particular case, first of all, the Court notes, one, it may not even have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3074 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Daniel H. Callahan
conviction followed a jury trial in which the State relied on eyewitness testimony to prove its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19772 - 2017-09-21