Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48561 - 48570 of 83389 for simple case search.

State v. Tee & Bee, Inc.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13691 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for the two counts of witness intimidation. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶6 At issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96201 - 2013-05-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
convicted of the charges in this case, but he was granted a new trial based on the State’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160744 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 Christopher asserts for the first time in his reply brief that “the issue in this case does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170448 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Nina Kennedy v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8933 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
robbery as party to a crime relating to the robbery of Jeff. The case proceeded to trial and a jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106932 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that this is not an exceptional case warranting a new trial. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594879 - 2022-11-29

[PDF] Frontsheet
2016 WI 85 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP358-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176538 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeffrey B. Haines
2003 WI 39 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 01-1311-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16508 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
undermined the case’s outcome. The appellant “must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33877 - 2008-09-02