Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48591 - 48600 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 27, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
to her. II. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. ¶16 Ineffective assistance of counsel claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133694 - 2015-01-26

COURT OF APPEALS
not dispute that he was properly served with the TRO on October 9, and does not claim any legitimate excuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125279 - 2014-10-28

State v. Dennis L. Farr
jeopardy because he has been twice prosecuted for the same underlying matter. Specifically, he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11376 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
deoxyribonucleic acid testing if all of the following apply: 1. The movant claims that he or she is innocent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35044 - 2008-12-29

[PDF] State v. Michael R.
stated that during the assault, the perpetrators asked him, "Why are you claiming [membership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9173 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
who considered Mendoza’s claim rejected an assertion that her back problems met the disability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33495 - 2008-07-23

Jami L. Van Boxtel v. Brent F. Van Boxtel
of [the petitioner]. 3. That [the respondent] waives and releases all claims or rights he might otherwise have
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17480 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jason J. Trawitzki
for each witness did not prejudice Trawitzki. ¶19 To prevail on a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15917 - 2005-03-31

Racine County Human Services Department v. Lakisha G.
and additionally to proceed on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7013 - 2005-03-31

River Bank of De Soto v. Raymond Fisher
. Duncan was present, and claimed that she was not liable under the terms of the 1992 note as she had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16980 - 2005-03-31