Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4861 - 4870 of 12458 for mr.
Search results 4861 - 4870 of 12458 for mr.
State v. Glen D. Hollister
arguments are not supported by the record. At the hearing, Hollister's counsel stated, "Mr. Hollister has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13077 - 2005-03-31
arguments are not supported by the record. At the hearing, Hollister's counsel stated, "Mr. Hollister has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13077 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maria S.
.” Mrs. R. v. Mr. and Mrs. B., 102 Wis. 2d 118, 131, 306 N.W.2d 46 (1981) (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6813 - 2005-03-31
.” Mrs. R. v. Mr. and Mrs. B., 102 Wis. 2d 118, 131, 306 N.W.2d 46 (1981) (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6813 - 2005-03-31
John K. Bille v. Christine Zuraff
the estate's § 766.63(1), Stats., tracing burden: MR. SCHOLM [estate counsel]: ... There is no question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8456 - 2005-03-31
the estate's § 766.63(1), Stats., tracing burden: MR. SCHOLM [estate counsel]: ... There is no question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8456 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derrick C. Montriel
this court great concern. It commented that the “positive Mr. Montriel, the one that’s involved in your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
this court great concern. It commented that the “positive Mr. Montriel, the one that’s involved in your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
State v. George S. Tulley
for cause, as the court explained: All right, Mrs. [E.] and I discussed and agreed in discussing it with her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3264 - 2005-03-31
for cause, as the court explained: All right, Mrs. [E.] and I discussed and agreed in discussing it with her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
: As I noted, the [c]ourt recognizes that Mr. Schley had provided sworn testimony regarding what had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072477 - 2026-02-04
: As I noted, the [c]ourt recognizes that Mr. Schley had provided sworn testimony regarding what had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072477 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the [November 2012] agreement was entered, Mr. Kajian demonstrated that he had no intention of acting in good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106010 - 2017-09-21
the [November 2012] agreement was entered, Mr. Kajian demonstrated that he had no intention of acting in good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106010 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, stating instead that there is “something underlying who Mr. Christopher is that draws him to this type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990081 - 2025-07-29
, stating instead that there is “something underlying who Mr. Christopher is that draws him to this type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990081 - 2025-07-29
State v. Robert Carnemolla
two convictions or three convictions did not make any difference … concerning the credibility of Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
two convictions or three convictions did not make any difference … concerning the credibility of Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
seemed to be far more credible” and that “Mr. Masarik’s testimony here was not the most clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175636 - 2017-09-21
seemed to be far more credible” and that “Mr. Masarik’s testimony here was not the most clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175636 - 2017-09-21