Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48671 - 48680 of 59723 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] Age at disposition: Statewide
%) 34 (99%) 42 (99%) 30 (100%) 30 (100%) 49 Small Claims (Contested) 10508 6823 (65%) 1510 (79%) 1346
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate19.pdf - 2020-02-27

[PDF] Age at disposition: Statewide
%) 42 (99%) 52 (99%) 38 (100%) 24 (100%) 36 Small Claims (Contested) 11530 7603 (66%) 1504 (79%) 1435
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate17.pdf - 2018-02-09

[PDF] Age at disposition: Statewide
%) 36 (99%) 44 (100%) 24 (100%) 23 (100%) 37 Small Claims (Contested) 13430 8695 (65%) 2025 (80%) 1659
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate15.pdf - 2016-02-25

[PDF] Age at disposition: Statewide
%) 18 (99%) 32 (99%) 36 (100%) 35 (100%) 44 Small Claims (Contested) 7793 4347 (56%) 1047 (69%) 1285
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate20.pdf - 2021-02-11

[PDF] Age At Disposition Summary - Statewide Report
%) 42 (99%) 43 (99%) 35 (100%) 30 (100%) 45 Small Claims (Contested) 7193 4476 (62%) 1009 (76%) 893 (89
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate21.pdf - 2022-05-06

[PDF] Age at disposition: Statewide
%) 31 (99%) 41 (99%) 26 (100%) 24 (100%) 42 Small Claims (Contested) 12162 8002 (66%) 1746 (80%) 1547
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate18.pdf - 2019-02-26

[PDF] Rules petition 08-27
) to claim judicial status as members of the State Bar of Wisconsin. On March 9, 2007, the State Bar’s
/supreme/docs/0827petition.pdf - 2010-01-20

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 19-25 - Interested persons communication
sufficient income for payment of eligible claims. You have received this letter because you or your
/supreme/docs/1925intpers.pdf - 2020-02-13

State v. Brett E. Alford
a written statement. Alford refused to sign a statement, claiming that he had had too much to drink. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11649 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert P. Dolan
. § 343.305. He claims the revocation order must be set aside because the imposition of statutory penalties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5247 - 2005-03-31