Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 491 - 500 of 45219 for Cost-effective.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. On August 26, Roehl mailed to Davis copies of his postverdict motion for frivolous costs and reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27137 - 2006-11-14

Frontsheet
consecutive to disciplinary suspensions already imposed on her, direct her to pay restitution and the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50466 - 2010-05-26

[PDF] NOTICE
relief. On August 26, Roehl mailed to Davis copies of his postverdict motion for frivolous costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27137 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 41
to pay restitution and the costs of the proceeding, as well as to secure 20 credits of Wisconsin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50466 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
Raftery pay the costs of the proceeding and that various conditions be imposed upon his resumption
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31168 - 2007-12-10

[PDF] WI 137
also recommended that Attorney Raftery pay the costs of the proceeding and that various conditions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31168 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of the earlier entered judgment; (2) because the judgment failed to reflect whether the frivolous costs were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30558 - 2007-10-09

[PDF] NOTICE
whether the frivolous costs were being assessed pursuant to WIS. STAT. §§ 802.05 or 814.025 (1999-2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30558 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Supreme Court rules petition 12-03 supporting memo
uncertainty in the courts about the effect of certain disclosures of communications or information protected
/supreme/docs/1203petitionsupport.pdf - 2012-02-21

[PDF] Thomas Hass v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals
by AgriBank of recovery of its costs. ¶6 While this federal action was pending, the state court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16469 - 2017-09-21