Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 491 - 500 of 4813 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Talun Blitar.
Search results 491 - 500 of 4813 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Talun Blitar.
State v. Lawrence Earl Parks
with the habitual criminality penalty enhancer; and (2) the amendment itself exposed him to double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13690 - 2005-03-31
with the habitual criminality penalty enhancer; and (2) the amendment itself exposed him to double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13690 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gary J. Hazen
, arguing that his sentences after revocation constitute double jeopardy, in violation of the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2770 - 2017-09-19
, arguing that his sentences after revocation constitute double jeopardy, in violation of the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2770 - 2017-09-19
2007 WI APP 224
on double jeopardy and claim and issue preclusion grounds.[1] Nommensen contends that this prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30317 - 2007-10-30
on double jeopardy and claim and issue preclusion grounds.[1] Nommensen contends that this prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30317 - 2007-10-30
[PDF]
Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc. v. Marvelle Enterprises of America, Inc.
then stated that any blue-blender "agreement" between Marvelle and Hamilton Beach "[wa]s strictly oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8872 - 2017-09-19
then stated that any blue-blender "agreement" between Marvelle and Hamilton Beach "[wa]s strictly oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8872 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jimmie Davison
and battery by prisoner punishments were multiplicitous, in violation of Davison's double jeopardy rights
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16490 - 2005-03-31
and battery by prisoner punishments were multiplicitous, in violation of Davison's double jeopardy rights
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16490 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 66
, and (2) if the answer to the first question is yes, did the circuit court double count the value
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67825 - 2014-09-15
, and (2) if the answer to the first question is yes, did the circuit court double count the value
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67825 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury was selected and sworn, a new trial would expose him to double jeopardy. We agree with Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36279 - 2009-04-28
the jury was selected and sworn, a new trial would expose him to double jeopardy. We agree with Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36279 - 2009-04-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
expose him to double jeopardy. We agree with Davis and reverse the order of the circuit court. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36279 - 2014-09-15
expose him to double jeopardy. We agree with Davis and reverse the order of the circuit court. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36279 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Colleen E. Hansen
.2d 845 (1998). ¶10 As a general matter, § 961.45 provides a form of statutory double jeopardy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17512 - 2017-09-21
.2d 845 (1998). ¶10 As a general matter, § 961.45 provides a form of statutory double jeopardy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17512 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
OWI sentencing guidelines
Doubles to $1200 - $4000 BAC Fine Range Triples to $1800 - $6000 BAC Fine Range Quadruples $2400
/publications/fees/docs/d7owi2023.pdf - 2023-09-15
Doubles to $1200 - $4000 BAC Fine Range Triples to $1800 - $6000 BAC Fine Range Quadruples $2400
/publications/fees/docs/d7owi2023.pdf - 2023-09-15