Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4901 - 4910 of 15281 for 2013.
Search results 4901 - 4910 of 15281 for 2013.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and postconviction remedies. See State v. Starks, 2013 WI 69, ¶41, 349 Wis. 2d 274, 297, 833 N.W.2d 146, 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121180 - 2014-09-15
and postconviction remedies. See State v. Starks, 2013 WI 69, ¶41, 349 Wis. 2d 274, 297, 833 N.W.2d 146, 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121180 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.32 (2013-14); 1 see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); State ex rel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164683 - 2017-09-21
. RULE 809.32 (2013-14); 1 see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); State ex rel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Douyette received a copy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153067 - 2017-09-21
809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Douyette received a copy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153067 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We summarily affirm. This case arises from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142793 - 2015-06-01
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We summarily affirm. This case arises from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142793 - 2015-06-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm. This matter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175468 - 2017-09-21
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm. This matter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175468 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14), 1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165970 - 2017-09-21
has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14), 1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14); 1 see also Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174491 - 2017-09-21
to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14); 1 see also Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174491 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
809.21 (2013-14).[1] In light of the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Houghton
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
809.21 (2013-14).[1] In light of the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Houghton
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
the same methodology as the circuit court. Stoker v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2013 WI App 144, ¶11, 352 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113113 - 2014-05-27
the same methodology as the circuit court. Stoker v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2013 WI App 144, ¶11, 352 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113113 - 2014-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97639 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97639 - 2014-09-15