Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4901 - 4910 of 68275 for did.
Search results 4901 - 4910 of 68275 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
glass of wine, but did not know how much Thornton or her husband had consumed. They got to the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62727 - 2011-04-12
glass of wine, but did not know how much Thornton or her husband had consumed. They got to the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62727 - 2011-04-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
); (2) did not object when the prosecutor called Grayer’s act “intentional” during closing argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64979 - 2014-09-15
); (2) did not object when the prosecutor called Grayer’s act “intentional” during closing argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64979 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Scott Michael Harwood
a driver’s license that did not have his Coachlight address. However, he was able to produce mail from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6031 - 2017-09-19
a driver’s license that did not have his Coachlight address. However, he was able to produce mail from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6031 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
urine test and did not recall receiving any other referrals for further testing. Regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913233 - 2025-02-07
urine test and did not recall receiving any other referrals for further testing. Regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913233 - 2025-02-07
[PDF]
John R. Ammerman v. Paddy A. Hauden
: NOT PARTICIPATING: ROGGENSACK, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18610 - 2017-09-21
: NOT PARTICIPATING: ROGGENSACK, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18610 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and a half days later to November 12th in the year 2008. Did you go to 734 North 26th Street that day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71891 - 2011-10-11
and a half days later to November 12th in the year 2008. Did you go to 734 North 26th Street that day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71891 - 2011-10-11
State v. Dennis M. Stanton
to submit to the test. We hold that the trial court did not do so and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11686 - 2005-03-31
to submit to the test. We hold that the trial court did not do so and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11686 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert E. Post
. Finally, the officer testified that Post did not jerk back and forth, did not drive erratically, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26122 - 2010-08-25
. Finally, the officer testified that Post did not jerk back and forth, did not drive erratically, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26122 - 2010-08-25
CA Blank Order
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2011-12).[1] We affirm. Roemer first argues that the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96233 - 2013-04-29
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2011-12).[1] We affirm. Roemer first argues that the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96233 - 2013-04-29
State v. Randolph S. Miller
that he did not want any felony convictions and did not want to plead to any charges that primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5554 - 2005-03-31
that he did not want any felony convictions and did not want to plead to any charges that primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5554 - 2005-03-31