Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4921 - 4930 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 4921 - 4930 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief.2 Baggesen argues that the trial court erred by refusing to declare a mistrial after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617262 - 2023-02-01
for postconviction relief.2 Baggesen argues that the trial court erred by refusing to declare a mistrial after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617262 - 2023-02-01
George T. Stathus v. James H. Horst
the first appeal. Horst and Edwards contend that the trial court erred at remand in trebling the damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4990 - 2005-03-31
the first appeal. Horst and Edwards contend that the trial court erred at remand in trebling the damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4990 - 2005-03-31
Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
and Leila Bailie (collectively “the Scotts”) appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14427 - 2005-03-31
and Leila Bailie (collectively “the Scotts”) appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14427 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
-2465 2 trial based on newly discovered evidence. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14427 - 2017-09-21
-2465 2 trial based on newly discovered evidence. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14427 - 2017-09-21
State v. Keith S. Betts
claims: (1) a Machner hearing is required to determine whether his trial counsel was ineffective; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4538 - 2005-03-31
claims: (1) a Machner hearing is required to determine whether his trial counsel was ineffective; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4538 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gerald Williams
was hearsay and was not cured by a limiting instruction; and that his right to a fair trial was violated when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21047 - 2006-01-24
was hearsay and was not cured by a limiting instruction; and that his right to a fair trial was violated when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21047 - 2006-01-24
State v. Bernard G. Tainter
] and an order denying his motion for post-trial relief. Tainter argues (1) ch. 980 violates due process because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4441 - 2005-03-31
] and an order denying his motion for post-trial relief. Tainter argues (1) ch. 980 violates due process because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4441 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals a judgment of conviction, entered following a jury trial, for misdemeanor battery, felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922257 - 2025-03-05
appeals a judgment of conviction, entered following a jury trial, for misdemeanor battery, felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922257 - 2025-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(2) (1993–94). Davis was granted the second trial in part because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109418 - 2017-09-21
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(2) (1993–94). Davis was granted the second trial in part because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109418 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
trial in part because the State introduced Davis’s statement at the first trial after indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109418 - 2014-03-24
trial in part because the State introduced Davis’s statement at the first trial after indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109418 - 2014-03-24