Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49631 - 49640 of 74849 for public records.
Search results 49631 - 49640 of 74849 for public records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95126 - 2014-09-15
the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95126 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213776 - 2018-05-31
considering the report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213776 - 2018-05-31
State v. Michael J. Rice
probation in a letter submitted to the trial court dated March 17, 1995. Rice asserts that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9120 - 2005-03-31
probation in a letter submitted to the trial court dated March 17, 1995. Rice asserts that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Duane R. Bull
only conclusory allegations, or the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3679 - 2017-09-19
only conclusory allegations, or the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3679 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
complaint against her former employer. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062702 - 2026-01-15
complaint against her former employer. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062702 - 2026-01-15
State v. Walter J. Griffin
The record supports the trial court’s finding of no breach in this case. The prosecutor unequivocally stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22
The record supports the trial court’s finding of no breach in this case. The prosecutor unequivocally stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion, based on the limited record that was available to the court at the time of sentencing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113770 - 2014-06-04
discretion, based on the limited record that was available to the court at the time of sentencing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113770 - 2014-06-04
Garry A. Borzych v. Daniel Bertrand
charge, but concluded that the entire conduct report should be vacated because the record did not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20742 - 2005-12-21
charge, but concluded that the entire conduct report should be vacated because the record did not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20742 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. After our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854231 - 2024-09-26
not filed a response. After our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854231 - 2024-09-26
Daniel V. v. Debie M.
School. However, Daniel V. fails to substantiate his arguments with citations to the record or to law.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9150 - 2005-03-31
School. However, Daniel V. fails to substantiate his arguments with citations to the record or to law.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9150 - 2005-03-31