Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4971 - 4980 of 16070 for probate.
Search results 4971 - 4980 of 16070 for probate.
Terry L. Hooker v. David Schwarz
on probation. In May 1988, probation was revoked and he received concurrent eight and two-year prison terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13411 - 2005-03-31
on probation. In May 1988, probation was revoked and he received concurrent eight and two-year prison terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13411 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court withhold sentence and impose three years of probation, with five months of conditional jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860562 - 2024-10-10
court withhold sentence and impose three years of probation, with five months of conditional jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860562 - 2024-10-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supervision or aftercare supervision […], the revocation of parole, extended supervision, or probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1184094 - 2026-10-01
supervision or aftercare supervision […], the revocation of parole, extended supervision, or probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1184094 - 2026-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, No. 2012CV3289, Alston sought certiorari review of revocation of his probation. The circuit court affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196693 - 2017-09-21
, No. 2012CV3289, Alston sought certiorari review of revocation of his probation. The circuit court affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196693 - 2017-09-21
Ed Mordell v. Peter Blumka
and LaVerne Blumka[1] appeal an order admitting the late Peter Blumka’s will to probate. The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3458 - 2005-03-31
and LaVerne Blumka[1] appeal an order admitting the late Peter Blumka’s will to probate. The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3458 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
considered probation as the least restrictive option, but determined that probation would not adequately
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98214 - 2013-06-18
considered probation as the least restrictive option, but determined that probation would not adequately
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98214 - 2013-06-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that a show of support matters for one being considered for probation but “this wasn’t even a close call
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157464 - 2017-09-21
that a show of support matters for one being considered for probation but “this wasn’t even a close call
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157464 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the circuit court took judicial notice that Zimmerman’s probation on the misdemeanor count had been extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501472 - 2022-03-29
, the circuit court took judicial notice that Zimmerman’s probation on the misdemeanor count had been extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501472 - 2022-03-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Monge on probation for two years. The circuit court gave Monge twenty-nine days’ sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819266 - 2024-07-03
Monge on probation for two years. The circuit court gave Monge twenty-nine days’ sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819266 - 2024-07-03
[PDF]
State v. Wesley H., Sr.
erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied Wesley H.’s motion for a mistrial after a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6467 - 2017-09-19
erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied Wesley H.’s motion for a mistrial after a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6467 - 2017-09-19