Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51 - 60 of 1592 for br.
Search results 51 - 60 of 1592 for br.
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Amicus Brief of Wisconsin Justice Initiative and Wisconsin Fair Maps Coalition re: Proposed Maps
Page 4 of 21 5 Case Filings Johnson Br., Jan. 12, 2024
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224brief.pdf - 2024-01-22
Page 4 of 21 5 Case Filings Johnson Br., Jan. 12, 2024
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224brief.pdf - 2024-01-22
[PDF]
Response Brief per CTO of 11-27-2021 (Wisconsin Legislature)
—the Leg- islature’s plan reduces them. See Legislature Br. 21. * * * The Legislature’s plans have
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefwislegis2.pdf - 2022-01-03
—the Leg- islature’s plan reduces them. See Legislature Br. 21. * * * The Legislature’s plans have
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefwislegis2.pdf - 2022-01-03
WI App 45 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP31 Complete Title of C...
under the new Wis. Stat. § 48.685(5)(br)5. (2011-12). The circuit court upheld the hearing examiner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94555 - 2013-11-17
under the new Wis. Stat. § 48.685(5)(br)5. (2011-12). The circuit court upheld the hearing examiner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94555 - 2013-11-17
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Response of Intervenors-Respondents Johnson et al. to Consultants' Report
no party has disputed or refuted. Johnson 1/12/24 Br. 27; id. 9–11 (describing what they prioritized
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0208intervenorresponse.pdf - 2024-02-08
no party has disputed or refuted. Johnson 1/12/24 Br. 27; id. 9–11 (describing what they prioritized
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0208intervenorresponse.pdf - 2024-02-08
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Intervenors-Petitioners Wright et al. re: Proposed Maps
courts across the country. See Wright Br. 36–38 (collecting cases). Both the Legislature
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224responsebrief.pdf - 2024-01-22
courts across the country. See Wright Br. 36–38 (collecting cases). Both the Legislature
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224responsebrief.pdf - 2024-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the Agreement Contract, the partnership of Konstantinos Bouras and Roupas (the BR partnership) agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85717 - 2014-09-15
the Agreement Contract, the partnership of Konstantinos Bouras and Roupas (the BR partnership) agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85717 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and William Bouras. Under the Agreement Contract, the partnership of Konstantinos Bouras and Roupas (the BR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85717 - 2012-07-30
and William Bouras. Under the Agreement Contract, the partnership of Konstantinos Bouras and Roupas (the BR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85717 - 2012-07-30
CA Blank Order
District IV March 10, 2014 To: Hon. Patrick J. Fiedler Circuit Court Judge 215 South Hamilton, Br
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108983 - 2014-03-09
District IV March 10, 2014 To: Hon. Patrick J. Fiedler Circuit Court Judge 215 South Hamilton, Br
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108983 - 2014-03-09
[PDF]
WI APP 45
that revocation was appropriate under the new WIS. STAT. § 48.685(5)(br)5. (2011-12). The circuit court upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94555 - 2017-09-21
that revocation was appropriate under the new WIS. STAT. § 48.685(5)(br)5. (2011-12). The circuit court upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94555 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Response Brief (Lisa Hunter et al.)
“is the legal rule in Minnesota,” based on a single case. Johnson Br. at 23 (citing Hippert v. Ritchie, 813
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefhunter.pdf - 2021-11-01
“is the legal rule in Minnesota,” based on a single case. Johnson Br. at 23 (citing Hippert v. Ritchie, 813
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefhunter.pdf - 2021-11-01