Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50081 - 50090 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 50081 - 50090 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to any issue that could be raised on appeal. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. This case arises from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191388 - 2017-09-21
to any issue that could be raised on appeal. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. This case arises from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
-degree sexual assault of a child with the use of force. The victim in the case was Phoudavong’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30580 - 2014-09-15
-degree sexual assault of a child with the use of force. The victim in the case was Phoudavong’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30580 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Marcellous Walker
which Walker appeals in this case. DISCUSSION A. Probable cause exists to believe Walker remains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25050 - 2017-09-21
which Walker appeals in this case. DISCUSSION A. Probable cause exists to believe Walker remains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25050 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
ignores recent, critical case law on this issue. In State v. Ndina, 2007 WI App 268, 306 Wis. 2d 706, 743
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47128 - 2010-02-16
ignores recent, critical case law on this issue. In State v. Ndina, 2007 WI App 268, 306 Wis. 2d 706, 743
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47128 - 2010-02-16
COURT OF APPEALS
before in this case.[1] The motion that Dean filed on September 30, 2009, specifically relied on Cherry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121253 - 2014-09-08
before in this case.[1] The motion that Dean filed on September 30, 2009, specifically relied on Cherry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121253 - 2014-09-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871943 - 2024-11-05
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871943 - 2024-11-05
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101244 - 2013-08-27
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101244 - 2013-08-27
State v. Richard A. Edwards
that Bohling supports his position in this case because the supreme court concluded that a delay in taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15571 - 2005-03-31
that Bohling supports his position in this case because the supreme court concluded that a delay in taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15571 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, withdrew his request for a trial de novo and stipulated that the court decide the case based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50828 - 2010-06-09
, withdrew his request for a trial de novo and stipulated that the court decide the case based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50828 - 2010-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
that Larson’s observations in this case did not give rise to reasonable suspicion. In Meye, this court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85108 - 2012-07-18
that Larson’s observations in this case did not give rise to reasonable suspicion. In Meye, this court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85108 - 2012-07-18