Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5031 - 5040 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5031 - 5040 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with treatment recommendations, and pay court costs. The court followed the joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754813 - 2024-01-25
with treatment recommendations, and pay court costs. The court followed the joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754813 - 2024-01-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
accepted the parties’ joint recommendation of a withheld sentence and a ten-year probation term. Within
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593300 - 2022-11-23
accepted the parties’ joint recommendation of a withheld sentence and a ten-year probation term. Within
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593300 - 2022-11-23
[PDF]
George W. Schmidt v. Linda L. Schmidt
working in the couple's joint carpet laying business. George was awarded the business and both parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10839 - 2017-09-20
working in the couple's joint carpet laying business. George was awarded the business and both parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10839 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
M. Carol Weissgerber v. Hans Weissgerber, Jr.
the judgment of divorce and the order denying Carol’s motion for reconsideration. BACKGROUND ¶3 Hans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6047 - 2017-09-19
the judgment of divorce and the order denying Carol’s motion for reconsideration. BACKGROUND ¶3 Hans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6047 - 2017-09-19
M. Carol Weissgerber v. Hans Weissgerber, Jr.
of divorce and the order denying Carol’s motion for reconsideration. BACKGROUND ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6047 - 2005-03-31
of divorce and the order denying Carol’s motion for reconsideration. BACKGROUND ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6047 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was found competent to stand trial. The circuit court denied Hansen’s pretrial motions to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214797 - 2018-06-26
was found competent to stand trial. The circuit court denied Hansen’s pretrial motions to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214797 - 2018-06-26
2010 WI APP 93
went to Bauer’s girlfriend’s home later that day to take him into custody, but he left before backup
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51491 - 2011-01-27
went to Bauer’s girlfriend’s home later that day to take him into custody, but he left before backup
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51491 - 2011-01-27
[PDF]
WI APP 93
that day to take him into custody, but he left before backup arrived. Police followed Bauer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51491 - 2014-09-15
that day to take him into custody, but he left before backup arrived. Police followed Bauer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51491 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert L. Ward
that the jurors would know Ward was in custody and would not be surprised to see him in shackles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7709 - 2005-03-31
that the jurors would know Ward was in custody and would not be surprised to see him in shackles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7709 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Ward
of disruptive behavior. The trial court also considered that the jurors would know Ward was in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7709 - 2017-09-19
of disruptive behavior. The trial court also considered that the jurors would know Ward was in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7709 - 2017-09-19