Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50371 - 50380 of 68502 for did.

State v. Robert E. Zastrow
that Zastrow had sexually assaulted Kelsey’s sisters, Kylee R. and Krystal R. Defense counsel did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15424 - 2005-03-31

State v. John P. Ganzhorn
false, which is not permissible. The trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12549 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Hubert Hill v. Paul Zimmerman
custodian did not misuse its discretion when it required Hill to prepay for requested copies of documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7964 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Laurie M. Marcukaitis v. State of Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission
. For example, she maintains that Platta did not actually see her put the chain across the Grille, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7219 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Luis Santana v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
a Knight petition in this court. The circuit court did not say whether it intended to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20592 - 2017-09-21

Russell S. Borst v. Allstate Insurance Company
three arbitrators. DeBaker, 194 Wis. 2d at 109. One arbitrator did not disclose that sometime earlier
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20366 - 2005-11-22

COURT OF APPEALS
Anderson’s request, concluding that the district attorney’s office did not have an “obligation … to obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36378 - 2009-05-04

State v. Jason J.C.
in ruling that it did not have authority to expunge the 1994 adjudications from its record. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12425 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, they never signed an affidavit of common law marriage, they did not have children together until moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798543 - 2024-05-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on the record, and he alleged that the “judge was prejudice[d]” and “bias[ed].” Although we did not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11