Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5041 - 5050 of 20930 for word.
Search results 5041 - 5050 of 20930 for word.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
everything word for word.” Counsel then argued that another problem with Ann’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780839 - 2024-03-26
everything word for word.” Counsel then argued that another problem with Ann’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780839 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” (citation omitted)). To make the lease a rational business instrument, McCune contends that the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000714 - 2025-08-26
.” (citation omitted)). To make the lease a rational business instrument, McCune contends that the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000714 - 2025-08-26
State v. Samuel Joseph Cole
, the interpretation of the prosecutor’s words “is a question of law to be determined independently by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19096 - 2005-07-25
, the interpretation of the prosecutor’s words “is a question of law to be determined independently by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19096 - 2005-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, fixtures or improvements.” In other words, the LLC contends there was no “mistake” made in the wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=951332 - 2025-05-06
, fixtures or improvements.” In other words, the LLC contends there was no “mistake” made in the wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=951332 - 2025-05-06
[PDF]
State v. Duane G. Heath
of commitment that the defendant’s words were setting forth to the Court but his actions or inactions didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25746 - 2017-09-21
of commitment that the defendant’s words were setting forth to the Court but his actions or inactions didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25746 - 2017-09-21
Thomas More High School v. Elizabeth Burmaster
definitions while nontechnical words and phrases are given their common, everyday meaning. Terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19237 - 2005-09-19
definitions while nontechnical words and phrases are given their common, everyday meaning. Terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19237 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 147
]nterrogation’” is not limited to “express questioning,” but also refers to “any words or actions on the part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72631 - 2014-09-15
]nterrogation’” is not limited to “express questioning,” but also refers to “any words or actions on the part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72631 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John T. Williams
apparently attempted to avoid this anomaly by adding the word "new" to the statute it found unambiguous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16872 - 2017-09-21
apparently attempted to avoid this anomaly by adding the word "new" to the statute it found unambiguous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16872 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas More High School v. Elizabeth Burmaster
in the statute are given their accepted technical or legal definitions while nontechnical words and phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19237 - 2017-09-21
in the statute are given their accepted technical or legal definitions while nontechnical words and phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19237 - 2017-09-21
State v. John T. Williams
of Internal Revenue v. Engle, 464 U.S. 206, 223 (1984). Further, this court may insert words into a statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16872 - 2005-03-31
of Internal Revenue v. Engle, 464 U.S. 206, 223 (1984). Further, this court may insert words into a statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16872 - 2005-03-31