Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50691 - 50700 of 68967 for had.

[PDF] James Earl Jackson v. Sidney Gray
of by will passes as if the killer had predeceased the decedent. (b) A final judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9972 - 2017-09-19

State v. Rodney G. Zivcic
-person jury, because the deputy had authority, pursuant to § 59.28(1), Stats., to arrest Zivcic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13816 - 2005-03-31

State v. James B.
was placed in the first foster home in December of 1997, he had “fairly severe” asthma, but has “gotten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6191 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Oshkosh v. Steven J. Winkler
Committee found that he had violated university rules. This administrative discipline resulted from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10639 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Brown, Jr.
that had to be resolved following remand of one of the cases from the Wisconsin Supreme Court. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15233 - 2017-09-21

State v. Anthony D. Oliver
complaint, at about 2:30 a.m. on January 8, 1994, Oliver attacked a woman who had been walking along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14829 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Harry S. Bernstein
demand for a Jury Trial” and that he had spoken to Bernstein’s counsel about this possibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14351 - 2014-09-15

Floyd J. Van Asten v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
. The lessee, Bee Frank, unlike Rollins, the lessee here, had a divisible interest in the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11032 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court found that although Waits’ personal expenses were significant, he still had the ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054854 - 2025-12-23

COURT OF APPEALS
had failed to provide the dealership’s financial statements as required by the divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35958 - 2009-03-23