Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50751 - 50760 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 50751 - 50760 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
, we need not address this alternative argument as cases should be decided on the narrowest grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28840 - 2014-09-15
, we need not address this alternative argument as cases should be decided on the narrowest grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28840 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., ¶37. ¶4 The State argues that prior cases have established that a disparity in sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71359 - 2011-09-26
.” Id., ¶37. ¶4 The State argues that prior cases have established that a disparity in sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71359 - 2011-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
began the decision section of its July 6, 2012 order by stating: “The parties agree that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108226 - 2017-09-21
began the decision section of its July 6, 2012 order by stating: “The parties agree that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108226 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William J. Westerman
against the victim in the present case, and also the absence of mistake or accident, in his frequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6884 - 2017-09-20
against the victim in the present case, and also the absence of mistake or accident, in his frequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6884 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
plea. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958883 - 2025-05-28
plea. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958883 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the case and addresses the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts, whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737034 - 2023-12-05
of the case and addresses the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts, whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737034 - 2023-12-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the evidence presented—including testimony from S.N.B., her case worker, and R.T.’s foster parent—the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868381 - 2024-10-29
on the evidence presented—including testimony from S.N.B., her case worker, and R.T.’s foster parent—the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868381 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699505 - 2023-09-06
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699505 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Meurer
interpretation of Meurer’s appellate argument. This is not a “subjective confusion” case. ¶9 In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7623 - 2017-09-19
interpretation of Meurer’s appellate argument. This is not a “subjective confusion” case. ¶9 In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7623 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). The judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175605 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). The judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175605 - 2017-09-21