Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51351 - 51360 of 83395 for simple case search.

Marathon County Department of Social Services v. Tonya B.
grounds exist for the termination of parental rights in those cases where the termination was contested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5850 - 2005-03-31

Angela M. McEvoy v. Group Health Cooperative of Eau Claire
for further proceedings. The relevant facts of this case are not disputed. Group
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10616 - 2005-03-31

Lacrosse County v. Mark P.
not be a pattern of abusive behavior. But, in this case, the court found that Mark had abused four children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10164 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
following his arrest, he “remained out of custody on this case until after the State filed the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106035 - 2014-01-28

COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 269, 280, 542 N.W.2d 196 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶8 In this case, we need go no further than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31509 - 2008-01-14

T.R. Thompson Builders, Inc. v. City of Madison Zoning Board of Appeals
or determination in question. Id. ¶9 Construing an ordinance under the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2293 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
was afforded an opportunity to explain himself and he elected not to. ¶11 Further, this case does not present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27383 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248657 - 2019-10-16

[PDF] Partners In Design Architects, Inc. v. Phoenix Internet Technologies, Inc.
in tort or contract. In tort cases, additional proof beyond the complaint is needed to award damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3651 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Raymond C. Williams
. An error is harmless in a criminal case if there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12168 - 2017-09-21