Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51351 - 51360 of 83988 for simple case search.
Search results 51351 - 51360 of 83988 for simple case search.
State v. Cindy Lou Kusisto
is entitled to have the enhanced parts of her sentences commuted pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 973.13 (“In any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26
is entitled to have the enhanced parts of her sentences commuted pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 973.13 (“In any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and explained their application to this case. See generally State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39-46, 270 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083398 - 2026-03-04
and explained their application to this case. See generally State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39-46, 270 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083398 - 2026-03-04
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144518 - 2015-07-13
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144518 - 2015-07-13
State v. Mark R. McNamee
lost jurisdiction when his probation term expired. He bases his argument on several cases dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15282 - 2005-03-31
lost jurisdiction when his probation term expired. He bases his argument on several cases dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15282 - 2005-03-31
State v. Romaine A. Langham
2006 WI App 149 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2164-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25668 - 2006-07-25
2006 WI App 149 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2164-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25668 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Anthony M. Johnson, Attorney at Law
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 86-0607-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16845 - 2017-09-21
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 86-0607-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16845 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jerome Foods, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
argues that Strzyzewski failed to prove a prima facie case that she applied for rehire and her employer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2904 - 2017-09-19
argues that Strzyzewski failed to prove a prima facie case that she applied for rehire and her employer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2904 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
concurrently with the sentence for a bail jumping conviction imposed in another Oconto County case. Payne’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75275 - 2011-12-19
concurrently with the sentence for a bail jumping conviction imposed in another Oconto County case. Payne’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75275 - 2011-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 FINE, J. This case has its genesis in an action Stephanie M. Przytarski, p/k/a Stephanie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65110 - 2011-05-31
. ¶1 FINE, J. This case has its genesis in an action Stephanie M. Przytarski, p/k/a Stephanie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65110 - 2011-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The parties agree that the sentencing transcript in Porter’s case does not show that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35457 - 2009-02-04
The parties agree that the sentencing transcript in Porter’s case does not show that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35457 - 2009-02-04