Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51451 - 51460 of 59782 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 51451 - 51460 of 59782 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
consequences of his pleas. A defendant claiming the right to withdraw a plea on those grounds must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43129 - 2009-11-04
consequences of his pleas. A defendant claiming the right to withdraw a plea on those grounds must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43129 - 2009-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS
Select Insurance, which ultimately denied coverage. The Zillmers filed a claim under the UM provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34519 - 2008-11-11
Select Insurance, which ultimately denied coverage. The Zillmers filed a claim under the UM provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34519 - 2008-11-11
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Thomas
’ claims that the State’s witnesses misrepresented his prior conviction (age of victim and nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12142 - 2017-09-21
’ claims that the State’s witnesses misrepresented his prior conviction (age of victim and nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12142 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶7 First, Lowrey claims that child support arrearages should be treated no differently than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39334 - 2009-08-12
. ¶7 First, Lowrey claims that child support arrearages should be treated no differently than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39334 - 2009-08-12
State v. Ronnie A. Malloy
admitted stabbing two youths with a steak knife. Id. at 253. At trial, the defendant claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17858 - 2005-04-26
admitted stabbing two youths with a steak knife. Id. at 253. At trial, the defendant claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17858 - 2005-04-26
State v. Zenobia W.
claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in terminating her rights because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6864 - 2005-03-31
claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in terminating her rights because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6864 - 2005-03-31
Christopher King v. Sonia G. King
held on January 5, 1996. He claims that the summons served on Sonia gave her notice that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12316 - 2005-03-31
held on January 5, 1996. He claims that the summons served on Sonia gave her notice that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12316 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
estoppel. ¶9 The Department also makes arguments based on issue preclusion or claim preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51818 - 2010-07-07
estoppel. ¶9 The Department also makes arguments based on issue preclusion or claim preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51818 - 2010-07-07
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
schedule in 2011. In 2023, David filed the motion underlying this appeal. Claiming that Susanna never
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
schedule in 2011. In 2023, David filed the motion underlying this appeal. Claiming that Susanna never
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing argument under the guise of a legally unaccepted science.” Moreover, Perekovich’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597720 - 2022-12-06
sentencing argument under the guise of a legally unaccepted science.” Moreover, Perekovich’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597720 - 2022-12-06