Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5151 - 5160 of 58507 for speedy trial.
Search results 5151 - 5160 of 58507 for speedy trial.
94 CV 380 Evelyn J. Fraser v. Daniel R. Marcussen
on the verdicts and the denial of her post-verdict motions, raising these claims: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11861 - 2005-03-31
on the verdicts and the denial of her post-verdict motions, raising these claims: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11861 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 948.025(1) (1999-2000).1 He has also appealed from an order entered in the trial court on January 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30575 - 2014-09-15
. § 948.025(1) (1999-2000).1 He has also appealed from an order entered in the trial court on January 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30575 - 2014-09-15
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
. Essex alleges that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
. Essex alleges that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeremy J. Schlitt
for a new trial. On appeal, Schlitt claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for several reasons. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9178 - 2005-03-31
for a new trial. On appeal, Schlitt claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for several reasons. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9178 - 2005-03-31
Shawn Krenke v. Timothy Krenke
the contempt action.[1] Timothy contends that the trial court erred by: (1) utilizing his earning capacity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10585 - 2005-03-31
the contempt action.[1] Timothy contends that the trial court erred by: (1) utilizing his earning capacity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10585 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reno D. Coffin
denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Coffin claims that the trial court erred in summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7298 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Coffin claims that the trial court erred in summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7298 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerome W.
responsibility under Wis. Stat. § 48.415(6). The trial court determined that it was in the best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20227 - 2005-12-21
responsibility under Wis. Stat. § 48.415(6). The trial court determined that it was in the best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20227 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by using sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31883 - 2014-09-15
issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by using sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
at approximately 6:00 p.m. on December 21, 1994. Expert testimony at trial indicated that Schipper died
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39904 - 2014-09-15
at approximately 6:00 p.m. on December 21, 1994. Expert testimony at trial indicated that Schipper died
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. No. 04-0768-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. No. 04-0768-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20